MishpishGossip mags make everyone pregnant
February 26th 2007 03:14
Can a week go by without a gossip mag spreading tall takes about yet another supposedly pregnant hollywood glamour idol?
Today's headlines state that Naomi's is in her second trimester to two year boyfriend Liev Schreiber. Time will tell. The same story speculated about Nicole being pregnant because of a comment she made in an interview to Russell Crowe.
I was in a doctor's waiting room the other day, flicking through an old gossip mag covering Nicole Kidman's wedding, saying how she was pregant and pointing out pictures where she had a bit of a tum tum. She certainly didn't look preggers at today's oscar gala, did she?
A couple weeks ago the same rumour was circling about the bald and bedraggled Britney. I hope she's not preggers, she's completely falling apart.
Another mag a couple months ago said Branjellina was pregnant again. Not true. Pointed to a bit of a tummy in a photo as 'proof'. The lady had a baby recently! Of course she's got a bit of a pouch (even if it's absolutely tiny).
What I love is that these magazines can publish these lovely candid photos (I also love the 'Stars without make up!' stories). But when the rumours pass with time and the truth does not reveal a baby, there aren't ever any corrections, are there?
Pregnancy should be a time of joy and not speculation, whoever you are. And NO woman wants to be mistakenly called pregnant -- major faux pas!
Maybe Naomi really is pregnant, or maybe she's just in a comfy relationship and she's put on a few pounds. It's up to Naomi to tell us when she's ready, one way or another. Not that she looked remotely fatty or pregnant on the red carpet!
Naomi Watts: pregnant or stylish?
Today's headlines state that Naomi's is in her second trimester to two year boyfriend Liev Schreiber. Time will tell. The same story speculated about Nicole being pregnant because of a comment she made in an interview to Russell Crowe.
I was in a doctor's waiting room the other day, flicking through an old gossip mag covering Nicole Kidman's wedding, saying how she was pregant and pointing out pictures where she had a bit of a tum tum. She certainly didn't look preggers at today's oscar gala, did she?
A couple weeks ago the same rumour was circling about the bald and bedraggled Britney. I hope she's not preggers, she's completely falling apart.
Another mag a couple months ago said Branjellina was pregnant again. Not true. Pointed to a bit of a tummy in a photo as 'proof'. The lady had a baby recently! Of course she's got a bit of a pouch (even if it's absolutely tiny).
What I love is that these magazines can publish these lovely candid photos (I also love the 'Stars without make up!' stories). But when the rumours pass with time and the truth does not reveal a baby, there aren't ever any corrections, are there?
Maybe Naomi really is pregnant, or maybe she's just in a comfy relationship and she's put on a few pounds. It's up to Naomi to tell us when she's ready, one way or another. Not that she looked remotely fatty or pregnant on the red carpet!
| 47 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog
Comment by Ash
Australian Traveller
Flashes of memories
these stories are what sells magazines unfortunately. What is todays headline lines tomorrow`s wastepaper basket....